On Friday 27th, we pitched our
chosen idea to mike. I felt everyone in my group spoke with confidence and were
able to suggest immediate possibilities if Mike had any concerns during our
pitch. We all balanced our pitch equally between each person and were felt
fully prepared for any constructive criticism. We pitched our idea, remembering
not to quote any technical aspects or large details, as this was not necessary
at this point in time. We all notably kept in mind, the idea of ‘one element’
and were able to consistently be aware of that throughout our pitch.
Overall, Mike gave us beneficial feedback
and I made notes throughout his comments, as this allowed us to immediately
respond to all the comments made; we responded by successfully carrying out
research towards improving our idea. I am very appreciative of his comments as
they made us realize some potential problems and helped us to try and over
seize them.
Feedback
Mike started out by stating there’s a couple
of things in terms of filming, firstly it is very difficult to film at night,
reasons for this is if the only shots we film are at night and suddenly we want
to make it day light to re-film parts, we can’t; but its also the case of practicality,
for example, we have to get all equipment, actors, consider travelling and this
could be a problem at night. Similarly, it is very difficult to film at night
because of the lighting, even film sets and locations when they shoot at night
have hundreds of thousands, if not millions of pounds of lighting, so therefore
our sequence will look very dark if filmed at night. However, if filmed in the
day, when editing can make our footage seem smoky, gloomy and foggy by adding
effects; Mike said it’s a shame because the thought process of transitions and
editing have been thoroughly thought through and also fond of the idea of the
girl dropping the lantern and it suddenly cutting to black, but still other
ways to achieve that effect in daylight. Mike was confused as to why a lantern,
but we’re simply using a lantern because she is having a dream and individuals
constantly dream of weird, random things in their sleep, so therefore we felt a
lantern suited the sequence. However, seeing as we are not filming it at night,
the lantern doesn’t make sense, so the girl will have a teddy as her prop
instead of a lantern.
Mike loves the idea being centred around a
maze, he feels it’s fantastic, as he’s never previously seen a thriller set in
a maze before by Hurtwood students, so he likes he original aspect. Need to
carry out productive research into mazes for preparation for matt next week and
contact them, considering locations to be within half an hour/ forty-five minutes,
so he said go for anything within an hour radius, prioritise the ones that our
closer, because would work out really well and would be a fantastic location,
so put in the effort to get one. So when pitching to Matt, not only say we want
to locate it in a maze, but we’ve already called and got permission to film in
a maze, soon as we say that, they will be happy because that’s a big problem.
Even though Katie suggested making our own maze, mike said we would not have
enough time or the resources or space to construct a maze and anything that
looked like it would just look like a girl running round the school ground, but
not same effect. However, alternatives for locations are research into
buildings, for example could film in Bea Webb or Cornhill, etc. Mike was very fond of our plot of a girl in
pajamas in a maze, bare foot and the idea of having the man to be dressed in a
suit to juxtapose the diversity, and so viewers don’t suspect anything
suspicious. He said, the girl being bare foot might be a health and safety
risk, therefore can compromise to girl wearing slippers, but likes the idea
that we never see the guy’s face as its lit in such a way that we don’t, Mike
found this really nice.
Lastly, he said to get a full-length mirror
that’s going to work could be a problem as they are heavy, hard to set up and
expensive but also difficult to transport in and out of the maze as we are sourcing
it our self. He was fond of the mirror idea, stating it works, lovely,
fantastic idea, only issue is he doesn’t see how practically it can be done,
unless you could build and make own but are you adding too much of your own
thing. So preparing us from the feedback from Matt as he will say how are you
going to get it in and out of the maze, so therefore we could compromise by
going smaller or shoulder length upwards or using a road mirror as easier to
handle or we could even use a light, cheap mirror and simply paint it or have
cobwebs draping over it if its an issue.
So overall, my group and I will forget
about it being shot at night because wont work. So the main two parts to
consider are where can we film it, find a maze and don’t give up with it as he
likes that were already thinking of other compromises, bringing back to the one
element idea that if you took away the maze would it still work, yes it will
still effectively work as its following the same concept of a girl in her pyjamas,
and a man following her, it works anywhere just would be really complimentary to
be located in a maze. He said he would personally, still shoot it and set it up
outside, as there’s something really nice about the girl in her pyjamas outside. Therefore, overall I feel our pitch to Mike
was successfully achieved and we know how to respond to his productive feedback
in preparation for our next pitch to Matt.
“Idea is fantastic, no holes in it, nothing wrong with it, a wonderful opening sequence to a thriller, so well done for that as there's not many people that nail it first time, and it is also a fantastic opening sequence, now just try to consider the limitations of what we can do.”
No comments:
Post a Comment