After finalising our thriller idea, we
notably relalised producing a test shoot is a main and key feature towards
making an opening sequence. This is simply because we can see anything that
went well or any problems before shooting the real footage. Unfortunately, as
we weren’t able to have any access to a maze in our test shoot, we shot in a
similar location behind trees and bushes. I used my iPhone to complete this
task and afterwards considered some reflecting questions.
Has
your idea translated well to a film? Have you made a thriller, or is it a
different looking genre?
Does
the pace work? Is the opening the right length?
Personally, I believe the pace works well
throughout our opening sequence, as we beneficially considered ways to build
the tension and suspense through pace. Therefore, our sequence consists of a
slow, mysterious introduction and steadily builds to increasing measures. I
also believe our opening sequence is the right length to grip and engage
viewers, and beneficially doesn’t give too much information away but leaves
members of the audience asking questions and longing to watch more.
Is
your idea clear to the viewer?
Our idea is clear to the viewer, as we
hugely considered that ‘less is more’ throughout our thriller, as we felt the
audience would be more engaged with a simpler effective opening sequence,
rather then confusing the viewer. Similarly, we only wanted to use two
characters throughout our sequence, so we do not complicate the viewer.
Has tension
been created?
Have
the angles and camera movement you used work? Or could they be developed?
I felt the camera angles we experimented
with did successfully work as we were able to explore a variety of angles we
wished to, personally I feel the low angle, close up shot of feet walking
through the rushes worked the best and looked most beneficial. However, if we
had more time I would of experimented more by using some more over the shoulder
shots, but I have no worries to use over the shoulder shots in real footage as
all the other angles used worked. If we had, had a proper camera and not an
iPhone, I feel our shots would of looked and worked better. I feel we still
need to consider using some more different angled shots for our real footage
but from experimenting different shots in our test shoot, it allowed us to be
constantly thinking of ways to visually explore shots further and continue to
develop them for our real shoot.
Do
you need to add or take away anything from your test shoot? If so what? And
more importantly why?
From our test shoot, I don’t feel we need
to take away anything, but later in development and planning we might have to
examine some footage so our sequence does not seek any possibilities of
becoming complicated or too busy. I believe we should maybe consider adding a
few more shots, for example, over the shoulder shots, so viewers can outline a
range of different, varied, effective shots.
What
has/ hasn’t worked well? And or could be developed further?
Overall,
my group and I worked well to create an effective test shoot and have continued
to work well together as a team to produce quick, successful work. I feel
everything worked well and we experimented with different shots and movements.
From some shots that didn’t work as well, we were able to consider improvements
to be made. Everything went according to plan and even though some shots could be developed
further, to explore the best outcome, we all worked very effectively and always
listened to each other if one had any suggestions to be made.
No comments:
Post a Comment